Power is one of the most misunderstood forces in human interaction.
In professional, educational, and creative environments, there is a growing desire to “flatten” hierarchies. Teachers aim to be approachable. Leaders strive to be relatable. Facilitators work to create horizontal spaces where everyone feels equal, safe, and heard.
These intentions are often deeply sincere.
And yet, power does not disappear simply because we wish it to.
Power Never Truly Vanishes
When people think of power dynamics, they often picture obvious structures:
• Teacher and student
• Manager and employee
• Director and performer
• Facilitator and participant
These are visible forms of power tied to roles and authority.
But power also operates in quieter, less visible ways.
Even in spaces designed to feel “equal,” asymmetries remain:
• Experience and expertise
• Social influence
• Emotional authority
• Access to opportunities
• Perceived status
• Psychological projection
Power is not just positional. It is relational and perceptual.
Most importantly:
Power is defined by how it is experienced, not how it is intended.
The Hidden Paradox of “Flattening” Hierarchy
In response to historically rigid or harmful power structures, many professionals attempt to dismantle hierarchy interpersonally.
A teacher becomes “one of the group.”
A leader emphasizes informality.
A facilitator minimizes visible authority.
Coffee after sessions. Casual conversations. Blurred relational lines.
This can foster connection, warmth, and trust.
But it also introduces a paradox.
Consider a mentor who genuinely wants to be seen as approachable and equal. They share informal conversations, humor, and personal presence with participants. Over time, relational closeness deepens — along with projection, attachment, and ambiguity.
No harm is intended.
Yet influence continues to operate.
When authority figures attempt to reject or minimize their power, the power itself does not vanish. Instead, it often becomes less visible — and therefore less consciously managed.
Unacknowledged power is not neutralized power.
It is power operating without clear structure.
The Nervous System Dimension of Power
Power is not only a social or structural phenomenon. It is also a biological one.
Human nervous systems are constantly scanning for cues of safety, threat, belonging, and hierarchy.
Power influences perception at a physiological level.
In many contexts, authority figures unconsciously function as regulators of the environment. Their tone, reactions, boundaries, and emotional steadiness shape how safe others feel.
Even subtle signals matter.
• Attention
• Approval
• Disapproval
• Proximity
• Emotional availability
When roles become ambiguous, nervous systems often experience uncertainty. Uncertainty can activate anxiety, attachment responses, or attempts to seek clarity through relational closeness.
What feels like friendliness to one person may feel like heightened significance to another.
Not because of intention — but because of perception.
Power as a Granted Responsibility
In leadership, teaching, and facilitation roles, power is not simply possessed — it is granted.
Students, teams, and participants actively (and often unconsciously) project trust, authority, and influence onto certain individuals.
With that projection comes responsibility.
Not only for decisions and outcomes, but for:
• Boundaries
• Clarity
• Predictability
• Emotional containment
• Ethical self-awareness
Power itself is not inherently problematic.
But power that is not consciously held often becomes unintentionally misused.
When “Equality” Masks Influence
Many well-intentioned professionals genuinely experience themselves as equals within their communities.
“I treat everyone the same.”
“We’re all just humans here.”
“There is no hierarchy.”
While psychologically understandable, this internal stance can obscure a crucial reality:
Influence does not require intention.
Authority does not require assertion.
Consider a facilitator who sees themselves as “just another participant.” They engage warmly, casually, and openly. Meanwhile, participants may still experience them as embodying expertise, validation, or access.
Power persists — even when denied.
Especially in environments involving emotional intensity, creativity, or personal development, relational signals carry disproportionate weight.
The Complexity of Mutual Dynamics
Power dynamics are rarely one-directional.
Individuals with less positional authority still possess forms of personal and relational power:
• Charisma
• Emotional expressiveness
• Social influence
• Interpersonal attraction
• Persuasive capacity
This often generates confusion.
A teacher may feel drawn toward a student.
A leader may feel pursued by a participant.
A mentor may feel the dynamic is mutual.
“It didn’t feel like I had the power.”
Yet power is not only about who initiates.
Power also concerns context.
Attraction, Projection, and the “Power Exchange”
Power itself is psychologically attractive.
Authority can symbolize:
• Recognition
• Safety
• Validation
• Opportunity
• Belonging
It is therefore natural that individuals may feel drawn toward those who embody influence.
What often unfolds is not manipulation, but human attachment dynamics.
A participant may unconsciously seek closeness to authority.
A mentor may unconsciously experience connection as mutuality.
Both can be true.
Without conscious awareness, relational dynamics may drift into territories neither party fully understands in the moment.
The Pitfall of Naivety
Perhaps the greatest risk is not malice, but naivety.
When professionals underestimate their influence or assume relational symmetry where asymmetry exists, they may unknowingly participate in dynamics they are structurally better positioned to recognize and regulate.
Ethical use of power requires more than good intentions.
It requires awareness of:
• Perception
• Vulnerability
• Projection
• Context
• Nervous system responses
A Restorative Justice Lens on Power
Restorative frameworks offer an important reframing.
Power is not inherently abusive.
Power is inherent to human systems.
The question is not whether power exists.
The question is how consciously it is held.
Restorative approaches emphasize:
• Accountability over blame
• Awareness over denial
• Repair over defensiveness
• Responsibility proportional to role
Acknowledging power is not self-incrimination.
It is relational maturity.
What Conscious Use of Power Looks Like
Healthy, ethical power does not mean rigidity or distance.
It means awareness and clarity.
• Recognizing influence even when unintended
• Maintaining warmth without collapsing roles
• Preserving boundaries without withdrawing humanity
• Understanding projection without exploiting it
• Holding responsibility without self-attack
In a nutshell
Power is not something we eliminate.
Power is something we steward.
Because the most consequential uses of power are often the ones we do not realize we are making.
Wondering how we can help?
Contact us. Find out if this is a good fit for you. We work with an integrative approach including psychological, legal and financial needs.
